đź•‘ Reading time: 1 minute
Moment distribution method offers a convenient way to analyse statically indeterminate beams and rigid frames.In the moment distribution method, every joint of the structure to be analysed is fixed so as to develop the fixed-end moments. Then, each fixed joint is sequentially released and the fixed-end moments (which by the time of release are not in equilibrium) are distributed to adjacent members until equilibrium is achieved. Moreover, the moment distribution method in mathematical terms can be demonstrated as the process of solving a set of simultaneous equations by means of iteration. Added to that, it falls into the category of displacement method of structural analysis. Finally, moments distribution method of structural analysis is thoroughly presented in the following sections in addition to provide solved example.Contents:
Basic definitions of terms in moment distribution method of structural analysis
Fixed end moments
Fixed end moments are the moments produced at member ends by when the joints are fixed. Table 1 provides equations for fixed end moment computations. Table 1: Fixed end moment equations![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Flexural stiffness
The flexural stiffness (EI/L) of a member is represented as the product of the modulus of elasticity (E) and the second moment of area (I) divided by the length (L) of the member. Additionally, what is needed in the moment distribution method is not the exact value but the ratio of flexural stiffness of all members.Distribution factors
Distribution factors can be defined as the proportions of the unbalanced moments carried by each of the members.Carryover factors
Unbalanced moments are carried over to the other end of the member when the joint is released. Added to that, the ratio of the carried-over moment at the other end to the fixed-end moment of the initial end is the carryover factor. Lastly, For prismatic members, the carryover moment in each span has the same sign as the distribution end moment, but is one-half as large.Sign convention
Any moment acting clockwise is considered to be positive. This differs from the usual engineer's sign convention, which employs a Cartesian coordinate system with positive x-axis to the right and positive y-axis up, resulting in positive moment about the z-axis being counterclockwise.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c837/8c837c54f605b0f9186257f8766b6c3fa3949d2d" alt="Moment distribution and common sign convention comparison Moment distribution and common sign convention comparison"
Fig.1: Moment distribution and common sign convention comparison
Framed structures
Framed structures with or without sides way can be analysed using the moment distribution method.Moment distribution analysis procedure for beams
1. Restrain all possible displacements. 2. Then, calculate Distribution Factors: The distribution factor DFi of a member connected to any joint J isdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8c7/ba8c74ccd346e038569aba496fe753e441454d72" alt="clip_image026 clip_image026"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32ee7/32ee7fc0f78e9a744ac16dc7321a5b8a5f6d7aa4" alt="clip_image027 clip_image027"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdbce/cdbcee151fc896fb493179f20c3e14ae3b0bbe33" alt="clip_image029 clip_image029"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6742a/6742a72c7a085528913405d10880aaaabd49427a" alt="clip_image030 clip_image030"
Me: external moment applied to the joint (if any)
Mo: total out of balance moment at the joint
FEMi: fixed-end moment
Mi: moment distributed to any member
DFi: distribution factor of member i
7. Calculation of the carry over moment at the far end of each member.
The procedure is stopped when, at all joints, the out of balance moment is a negligible value. In this case, the joints should be balanced and no carry-over moments are calculated.
8. Finally, calculate the final moment at either end of each member.
This is the sum of all moments (including FEM) computed during the distribution cycles.
Analyzing statically indeterminate beam using moment distribution method
- Members AB, BC, CD have the same length
.
- Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively.
- Concentrated load of magnitude
acts at a distance
from the support A.
- Uniform load of intensity
acts on BC.
- Member CD is loaded at its mid-span with a concentrated load of magnitude
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c434c/c434c7e7ab70c58cf7405dd81c8c3756c9ad504f" alt="Indeterminate beam example Indeterminate beam example"
Fig.3: Indeterminate beam example
Fixed-end moments
In the following calculations, counterclockwise moments are positive:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe36b/fe36bba9e4feb732105901ab8ed0546e79bcff4c" alt="clip_image006 clip_image006"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7127/d7127a8dfc7594586502be1e405406443f81de48" alt="clip_image007 clip_image007"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80675/8067544b26b907e4be2ad850f9e228807f99e9c6" alt="clip_image008 clip_image008"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e93/a7e93b6a61333681956fd6c4a609ba1562165e4e" alt="clip_image009 clip_image009"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ef57/4ef57d9ba13e05af9eaeaea5ee3178d4892d1c84" alt="clip_image010 clip_image010"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ed56/8ed5619bf32cc2659d4dfd5e72203ea351c10d99" alt="clip_image011 clip_image011"
Distribution factors
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba305/ba30590a068660ba70e8c7903287eb83e721c89b" alt="clip_image012 clip_image012"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59cb5/59cb5d313ce831c6fde656e7c32c23ba8fc855e7" alt="clip_image013 clip_image013"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4554d/4554d881a241e2381cb7000820a1b80e001a7b40" alt="clip_image014 clip_image014"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72b5b/72b5bd5134c165449e8ee93c05d37a99b3ebe7a3" alt="clip_image015 clip_image015"
Carryover factors
The carryover factors aredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed6f2/ed6f26072673e689fdf18830ec5460911130c059" alt="clip_image016 clip_image016"
Details of calculations
Table 2: details of moment distribution calculationsJoints |
A |
B |
C |
D |
||||
Distribution factors | 0 | 1 | 0.2727 | 0.7273 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed-end moments | 14.700 | -6.300 | 8.333 | -8.333 | 12.500 | -12.500 | ||
Step 1 | -14.700 | -7.350 | ||||||
Step 2 | 1.450 | 3.867 | 1.934 | |||||
Step 3 | -2.034 | -4.067 | -2.034 | -1.017 | ||||
Step 4 | 0.555 | 1.479 | 0.739 | |||||
Step 5 | -0.246 | -0.493 | -0.246 | -0.123 | ||||
Step 6 | 0.067 | 0.179 | 0.090 | |||||
Step 7 | -0.030 | -0.060 | -0.030 | -0.015 | ||||
Step 8 | 0.008 | 0.022 | 0.011 | |||||
Step 9 | -0.004 | -0.007 | -0.004 | -0.002 | ||||
Step 10 | 0.001 | 0.003 | ||||||
Sum of moments | 0 | -11.569 | 11.569 | -10.186 | 10.186 | -13.657 |
Results
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution methoddata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88215/88215db4504db9ffab74f236e9839b5a0f9500b7" alt="clip_image019 clip_image019"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c244/2c244b4120e6c81d3fed27bd85a2a71dda02e5b3" alt="clip_image020 clip_image020"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/755e8/755e85a0b3584e5faad956b271add0823c68e4d1" alt="clip_image021 clip_image021"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472ad/472ade8c60441d47af3db1a7e96305aeabd97446" alt="clip_image022 clip_image022"
Shear force and bending moment diagram
Table 3 provides shear and moment diagram for the analyzed beam. Note that the moment distribution method only determines the moments at the joints. Moreover, developing complete bending moment diagrams require additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium. Table 3: shear force and moment diagram for the analyzed indeterminate beamShear force diagram
![]() |
Bending moment diagram
![]() |
Moment distribution method result vs stiffness matrix method result
For comparison purposes, the following are the results of the same beam using a matrix method. As it may be noted in the analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. Surprisingly, the fact that the matrix analysis results and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence. Moments at joints determined by the matrix method![clip_image019[1] clip_image019[1]](https://test.theconstructor.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/clip_image0191.gif)
![clip_image020[1] clip_image020[1]](https://test.theconstructor.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/clip_image0201.gif)
![clip_image021[1] clip_image021[1]](https://test.theconstructor.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/clip_image0211.gif)
![clip_image022[1] clip_image022[1]](https://test.theconstructor.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/clip_image0221.gif)